Fake Study Saying "Dog Parks Are Cesspool For Rape Culture" Earns Real Award And Now Author Is In Real Trouble

What does that gif look like to you? Did you say it looked like normal dog behavior? Well if you did it means you are homophobic and don’t care about human female sexual assault victims. At least according to Academics who read a fake study and came to that conclusion.

Now look, I am treading very carefully here. This is not going to be a political blog. If you get too loud about politics in Chicago you get whacked. I also don’t want to give the comment section an excuse to throw a “lib cuck” parade. Having said that, funny is funny and this objectively funny. Elite level trolling of the most obnoxious type of people.

The title of this fake and award winning thesis was “Human Reactions to Rape Culture and Queer Performativity at Urban Dog Parks in Portland, Oregon“. That reads like a god damn Onion article. But if you’re looking for reasons to be outraged about things that already outrage you then sentences like “Because of my own situatedness as a human, rather than as a dog, I recognize my limitations in being able to determine when an incidence of dog humping qualifies as rape. In particular, from my own anthropocentric frame, it is difficult if not impossible to ascertain when canine sexual advances are un/wanted, or when they are rapes rather than performances of canine dominance, which introduces considerable unavoidable ambiguity in my interpretations of this variable.” aren’t going to raise red flags. If you use phrases like “my situatedness” or phrases like that don’t make your eyes do a full revolution inside your head then you are a douchebag and are susceptible to being duped by a fake academic report about what reactions to dog humping means about your internal bias.

My personal favorite anecdote of the story were the people who peer reviewed the nonconsensual dog humps in the park and tried to up their outrage. They were “worried that they didn’t respect the dogs’ privacy during the study”. Personally, I agree. Carl’s dog and Barstool Chicago mascot, Scottie Puppen, is known to lick up his smegma. It’s gross and I know he feels a bit of shame when we see him do it. I’m sure he’d prefer to do it in private and for people to stop looking at him while he licks his own dick, not for pleasure but for personal hygene. Going forward, if people are going to conduct fake dog hump studies, please respect dog genitalia and their privacy.

I can just imagine a professor of woman studies at NYU or Amherst reading this and reacting like Ralphie’s teacher in A Christmas Story

The people who wrote these fake explained their process and purpose in this video which is kind of interesting/scary. These papers were worked on between 2017 and 2018. The reason why this is relevant again today is because the principle guy involved is now facing the wrath of the intellectual academia elite. If there is one thing intellectuals hate, it’s being made to look stupid. The ole fake dog park hump gender bias study prank got them good and now they’re going after the professor behind the hoax.

Advertisement

(source)–A scholar whose carefully crafted fiction helped expose the rot within some sectors of the modern academy is now under fire from his home, Portland State University, although prominent academics throughout the West have risen to his defense.

Peter Boghossian, an assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University in Oregon, led a trio of scholars last year who submitted to leading publications what they called “intentionally broken” papers on gender, race and sexuality. Several of the absurd pieces were published.

Now, Portland State has initiated disciplinary action against Mr. Boghossian for what it calls a breach of the institution’s ethical guidelines.

Ultimate mess-with-the-bull-get-the-horns situation for this guy. Absolutely hilarious hoax that points to a very real problem. Credit to him, but he’s probably going to end up jobless now.