Random Thoughts
The Retarded Jets Fan is only giving the Pats one more week
It's a shame that this guy's gonna quit doing these in three weeks when football is over. Where else are you gonna find such in-depth insight like "Peyton Manning is more hungry, than Tom Brady and crew..."
Disney wants Keira Knightley to get implants

Saw this online today on I Watch Stuff, production art from the upcoming Pirates of the Caribbean 3...Notice something wrong with this photo? Maybe it's those cannon balls hanging out of Keira Knightley's shirt.

It's not the 1st time that a production company has increased her bust size, or the first time Disney has had a horny artist head up a project (see Jessica Rabbit), but who are they trying to kid here? If they really need a chest to sell the movie (as any good film does), why not just get JLH:



Bill Simmons Misses The Boat
I really don’t read Bill Simmons anymore. But today a couple readers forwarded me his latest article he wrote about the Patriots and then I just saw it again on the front page of ESPN.com. And since most of the country views Bill Simmons as the voice of the Boston sports fan despite the fact he lives in Hollywood, I felt I needed to weigh in on it. Here is an excerpt from his article;
After one of the greatest victories in Patriots history, after one of the defining Sundays of the Belichick-Brady Era, after an absolute roller-coaster ride of a win, after one of the more memorable they-had-absolutely-no-business-winning-that-thing games in recent memory, I turned the television off, pulled off an awkward high-five with my father and waited for the phone to ring.
And I waited.
And I waited.
Nothing. None of my friends called. My mom never called. None of my editors called. I even checked the ringer on our phone to make sure it was working. Yup. It was working. I jumped online and only two friends had sent along their congratulations (mainly because they had both wagered on the Pats). That was it. I briefly zoomed through reader e-mails and was shocked to see the same three themes over and and over again: either "You guys are so freaking lucky," "The Chargers freaking choked" or "Just kill me, now I have to sit through another freaking week of Pats-Colts hype."
At this point, I was starting to get bummed out. How could people not appreciate an undermanned, banged-up underdog that persevered simply by playing well together, by being well-coached and well-prepared, by pulling off all the Little Things and by believing in one another and steadfastly trusting they could pull out any close game? How could people not appreciate Troy Brown's supernatural strip of Marlon McCree (one of the greatest heads-up plays in Boston sports history), or Brady's slogging through a dog-crap game and having the balls to zing that ridiculously clutch throw to Reche Caldwell on the winning drive? How could they fail to be impressed that Belichick and the Pats knocked off a 16-1 team, a 16-2 team, a 15-3 team, a 14-2 team, a 14-3 team and a 14-4 team over the past five Januarys?
Then I realized something horrible.
Wait a second ... am I rooting for the football version of the Yankees?
I felt like Steve Martin realizing he was white in "The Jerk." And the thing is, I could see this coming for three years. People expect the Patriots to pull out close games. They're bored of watching it happen. They're tired of Patriots players and fans playing the "nobody believed in us" card. They're tired of writers and talking heads breaking out the popsicles for Brady and Belichick every January. It's becoming a formula -- nobody thinks the Pats can pull it off, the odds are impossible, MY GOD THEY DID IT AGAIN! -- which is unfortunate because formulas become boring pretty quickly.
Still, if the Pats really have turned into the football Yankees, then everyone outside of New England believes that ...
A.Rooting for the Patriots is like rooting for the house in blackjack.
B. An entire generation of fledgling NFL fans is being raised to root against them as we speak.
Just writing those last two sentences gave me the Manning Face. How could this be? How did we get here?
Let me start by saying Bill Simmons is officially out of the loop in terms of having a grasp on the pulse of the Boston sports fan. I am borderline shocked that admits that he didn’t talk to anybody after the Pats beat the Chargers. This makes it seem like we have become Atlanta Braves fans. That we yawned as the the Pats went for the two pt conversion and fell asleep as Brady connected with Reche Caldwell to put us in field goal position. This couldn’t be further from the truth. I and everybody I know was on pins and needles the entire game. I know that I was on the phone with my buddies and my family throughout the entire game. I assume everybody else was too. Last week’s victory was undoubtedly one of the most remarkable wins in the history of the franchise. I don’t think anybody took it for granted or was ho hum about it. Just look at our freaking blog. We could barely contain ourselves. So I think the fact that Simmons didn’t talk to anybody after the game just shows how removed he is from Boston.
Okay moving on. I agree with his main point of the article that the Pats have become like the Yankees. They are the team that everybody expects to win. But the fact that he views this as a bad thing is ludicrous. What sports fan doesn’t want to root for the dynasty? That’s the dream! It’s the pinnacle of being a sports fan. So my question is why is Simmons upset that the country views the Pats as the baseball equivalent of the Yankees. That’s like the highest compliment anybody can pay us. And let’s clear up one thing. Rooting for a dynasty isn’t boring. I love how everybody hates us. I love how everybody whines and moans after we beat them. Being the big bully is a million times more fun than being the plucky underdog.
Furthermore sports in general is more interesting when a dynasty is involved. The rest of the country isn't bored with the Pats. They may hate us, but hate breeds interest. Whenever a Dynasty is in the mix, regardless if it’s the Pats, the Celtics, the Yankees, the Canadians etc., it’s more exciting because everybody has an opinion. You're either with us or against us. There is no in-between. When I was growing up I hated the 49'ers and Cowbody because they always won. I hated their players, their fans and everything about them. There was nothing I rooted for more than to see them lose a big game which they rarely did. But that's what winning does. It makes you a target but it also makes it fun. Let me put it this way; would you be more interested in a World Series that featured the Yankees vs. Cardinals or Tigers vs. Cardinals? It’s a no brainer. People want to see what happens with the Yankees. It’s the same thing with the Patriots. And I don’t know anybody in Boston who is tired of this run. The bottom-line is that winning never gets old. It only gets better and sweeter as you piss off more and more people and ruin more and more dreams. So if Simmons and his buddies can’t get excited about beating the Chargers last week than maybe it’s time for him to retire his pen.
Personally, I don't think he is far off, just wrong about the motivation. I kind of feel like, at this point, I can't celebrate just MAKING IT to the AFC Championship. I won't call anyone to brag, celebrate, or gloat until we win the Superbowl. It's not that we don't care, we just raised the bar on our expectations.
And outside of New England, I don't exactly remember anyone else rooting for us either.
"Being the big bully is a million times more fun than being the plucky underdog." Perfect.
It took a while, but Simmons is offically Left Coast, out-of-touch beautiful person. For sure he no longer speaks for me. Time to go back to 10,000 words about the Phoenix Suns.
Actually, I thought both of your arguments were pretty good, and I was actually coming to this page to post the article.
However, I do disagree with a couple points.
Honestly, I'm more of a fan of the underdog.
But I think that's still what the Patriots are. Statistically (we're underdogs by a Vinatieri FG this week) and mentally, (The Colts have beat us the past two times, people must be expecting us to lose.)
So even though I root for the underdog, I think the Patriots are the underdog.
And I didn't mind being the bully in 03-05 either.
But if we win this year, I think that puts us in the top 5 dynastys of all time, if we weren't already.
I thought his major theme was that people are bored with the Pats and Pats fans take it for granted. I couldn't disagree more.
He seemed like a 150lb cunny when he was in Boston, so I don't think LA has changed him that much. I do laugh how it's cool to hate him and yet everyone reads him. You sound like you're complaining about Howerd Stern.
Yeah I just read his article and he does not speak for me. I was almost pissing myself when Caldwell caught the deep bal from Brady. I was on the edge of my seat the whole game. Winning like that doesnt get old. Its hard to compare baseball and football playoffs. Single elimination makes every playoff game so important and so exciting. He has officially lost touch with Boston sports. He's no better a spokesman now than Ben Affleck is.
El-presisnte of the small hat franchise-
Simmons made good points about how outsiders view the PATS it has been liek that for a while- I think one of the main points he drove home was, Pats fans don't care- who gives a fuck about how they are viewed. Not a bad article- love his comment on david spades stupid dance on that commercial.
he is a sellout though!
I dont know about everyone else but I was on edge more in that game that I have been in a while. My father and I are season ticket holders and we spent some decent time on the phone during and after the game. I was definitely standing most of the game.
The david spade dance is a good point. I almost throw up everytime I see it.
i guess my reading skills suck i thought he said
1. new englanders still fucking love the patriots
2. we still think of the pats as underdogs and the class act of the league
3. non new englanders are bored with the pats, and he doesnt know why
all three are pretty accurate.
"I thought his major theme was that people are bored with the Pats and Pats fans take it for granted. I couldn't disagree more."
A lot of people are vocally bored about it but the whole thing with not calling? That wasn't about other fans. That was more in the way I called my friend who's a Bears fan after that game ended to share the "Holy shit, I didn't even care and Rex Grossman scared me half to death" vibe.....
No offense, but I'd be less than honest if I didn't say that I think history and past perception kindof influenced how you interpreted some of his point (namely the impression that New England fans were somehow apathetic about their team's success)
Cause it just isn't there.....and I think if you show that to anyone who didn't have a previous axe to grind with Simmons, they wouldn't read that out of it......
That's also one of the reasons I don't read him anymore. I've been meaning to blog about that forever and I don't want to be accused of stealing his thoughts
I think Simmons' main problem with this whole thing is giving a fuck what other people think of the Pats and Pats fans. Because he's writing for a national audience its like he has to apologize for the Pats dominating the league instead of doing the natural thing and laughing at the rest of those poor suckers. I honestly could not give a shit if some asshole from Phoenix or Iowa is "sick of the Patriots". Go fuck yourself and come back when you have a good team. The last thing I'm gonna do before the AFC Championship is worry about how the Pats are perceived around the country.
Mark,
I totally disagree with his pt #3 which we agree on that non new englanders are bored with the pats. Pats have been the best matchup every round of the playoffs because it's the pats.
He's confusing bordem and hatred.
Also, he made it sound like his buddies are bored with the pats because they always win.
wow. didnt i just post this same sentiment a couple of days ago. im a fuckin genious.
it truly is ironic that somehow the pats became the yankees of football, when most all pat fans are sox fans and for so many years they played underdog, now they are top dog.
side note, is it true the pats only let up 10 passing TDs? if so im damn impressed.
One difference between the Yankees and the Pats is that the Yankees tried to buy championships the past 5 or so years and the Pats have had to do it within a salary cap structure. The NFL is far more competitive. And also the Pats have 3 rings this century and the Yankees have none...
i agree with mark. i didnt get the same impression you got el pres.
though, i will agree, i was on pins and needles and texting/calling everyone after the game.
from a structure standpoint i fully agree with mcm. however, from a fan standpoint its either you like the pats or you hate em. They have achieved people disliking them even if they don't like the other team. I.e. yankee syndrom. "i root for the sox and anyone who beats the yankees"
elpres -
Love your point about the value of dynasties being rooted in the hatred of them. I've always felt that an up and coming team should feel better a bout challenging a dynasty than ending up on top by default in a mediocre league. I think it's great that in an age of "Parity" that there are still franchises that are near the top every year for many years in a row. The Pats have clearly been the class of that group based solely on the only statistic that matters - championships. teams like Indy and Philly (my personal rooting interest) have been hanging near the top consistently but have never managed to get over that hump. But in the process, even those also-rans have built up some negative fan bases over the years among the fans of "the rest of the pack". To be the best you have to beat the best. Punking Seattle just doesn't feel quite the same.
I think the idea of non new englanders being bored with the Pats is technically true if you take what people say at face value.
That editorial on MSNBC.com a few days ago? Every analyst/writer you'll see? Peopled on pretty much any nationally based message board? They're all expressing this same sorta frustration of boredom/anger in that "success breeds contempt" way....
I'm not sure I buy all of it as true, since some of the criticism seems forced, but seriously, in the National media, who outside of Peter King still seems to express the same sense of awe and excitement for this team as they probably should be?
Right now, a lot of America just wants fresh meat even more than they really wanna see Manning win one.....
I agree with Mark El Pres.
Your hatred for Simmons is skewing your perception
He could write about anything and you would hate it
Maybe you're just jealous because he once wrote an online boston sports blog and is now on ESPN while you're still living in Swapscott or where ever the fuck you're from
pats fans sound amazingly similar to yanks fans on all these posts, arrogant pricks.
I'm sorry but I think you completely misread the article...
At no point did Simmons' ariticle say "that we (Pats fans) yawned as the the Pats went for the two pt conversion and fell asleep as Brady connected with Reche Caldwell to put us in field goal position."
In fact, he was saying the exact opposite. In his third to last paragraph, Simmons writes "Just know that rooting for the Patriots isn't like rooting for the house in blackjack. See, we never feel safe. We never feel like we're going to crush everyone else. We're constantly astounded by what's happening, and we never fail to appreciate the significance of it"..."Much like Private Ryan, we earned this."
I love the Stool and read it everyday. But, Simmons' article was pretty good and I had butterflies in my stomach after reading it so I felt obligated to defend him.
I don't like Simmons for personal reasons. I've never hidden that. I've also said he's my favorite writer of all time. So Uncle Suck you got to wake up and do your research. Clearly you are new here by the fact you think I live in Swampscott.
You guys are fucking hysterical. Each and everyone of your bloggers rips on Simmons whenever you get the chance. I find this to be rather comical because you wouldn't even be writing your feeble blogs if it weren't for Simmons. Come on, admit it. While Simmons might have lost his fastball, his material is 10x more funny, witty, insiteful and more well written than anything that appears on this site. Think I'm wrong? Who was the assclown who wrote his little running diary of his Thursday night? That blog was the skim-milk of Simmons' running diaries. Come on, you guys are all watered down versions of Simmons yet you all dump on the guy whenever you get the chance. You should be writing him thank-you emails everyday because none of you witless fucks would be writing anything other than TPS reports during your workdays if it weren't for Simmons hitting it big blogging on his website. Fuck you. That is all.
EP you opened up a big can of worms with this one, and while I don't agree with your depiction of bill's most recent I do back and all these guys posting should be happy YOU put this site together for all of us to Bullshit on all day, keep it up
Frank Costanza nailed it; the fact that Simmons is writing for a national audience forces him to address the pats on a national level. He tries to capture what the rest of the country is thinking about our success, which naturally may offend or dishearten our fan base (which is strond as ever by the way). Put it this way; if he had told us that the rest of the country loved the pats and was happy we were on the verge of the greatest dynasty in NFL history, would anyone beleive him? I sure wouldn't...
"Who was the assclown who wrote his little running diary of his Thursday night?"
Answer: Justin Rebullo, he's a tool.
TPS reports. ha
Big Windy you have no clue what you're talking about. I haven't written about Simmons in months. If I had to take a rough guess I'd say maybe even a full year.
And this blog has zero to do with him. He was not a blogger, never was. The Deadspins, Sportsbybrooks etc have way more influence on the blog than him.
You are truly clueless.
Personal Reasons?
Like what?
He wouldn't sign your copy of Now I Can Die in Peace?
All joking aside where does your hate for Simmons come from?
His football colums are the only reason I make it back to the office after Friday lunch
I gotta side with Mark Scal and US here. I thought the article was great. The media definately don't want the Pats invovled so that they can find new story lines. Although I dissagree that the average fan outside of Boston can't appreciate the Pats. I think they absolutely do. If anything I think Simmons fell into the trap of thinking that the national media represents the mindset of the average fan, which they clearly do not since all the arguments on these sports-talk shows he mentioned are staged anyway. Also Prez, I loved the Niners and Cowboys growing up. Sorry, but after a season full of watching rooting for and ultimately being hugely dissappointed by the Pats, I was looking for a winner in the NFC to hook up with come playoff time.
Just don't let the fact that you have an axe to grind with this guy affect they way you read/comment on him. That's what it's sounding like.
I don't think the nation really hates on the Pats, but the national media sure does. And by national media I mean ESPN, which thrives on attention-grabbing spectacle, highlights and individual achievement, three things the Patriots have more or less eschewed.
Nationally, a LOT of people hate Peyton Manning. You think anybody in Wisconsin or Minnesota is pulling against the Pats if the Bears win the NFC? The only team that's more or less Teflon is the Saints.
The Patriots may have won three Super Bowls since 2001, but I can really think of only one time we were an unstoppable juggernaut, going into SB 39, and even then much of the attention was showered on TO and that idiot Freddie Mitchell. The Pats were underdogs all through the 01 playoffs, many had the Colts favored to destroy them in 03 and 04, and everyone liked the Chargers last week.
Meanwhile, the Yankees are picked to win every year because "they're the Yankees." I'll tell you what, if the Pats roll to about 23 more Super Bowls in the next three-quarters of a century we can make this comparison, although I'll probably be dead. Whatever.
Billy,
That's fine. I had buddies who loved the 49ers and Cowboys too. That's the point though. You either love or hate a dynasty.
Simmons is saying on a national level people are bored with the pats and that Pats fans take winning for granted.
Totally disagree.
Big Windy, I kill people for a living. So fuck you.
Bill Simmons isn't and never was a blogger. Okay El Presidente, ooookay. I'd beg to differ, but who am I to disagree with the man who created the Barstool Sports empire. I'll take the under on a year by the way.
Justin Rebello
You are skim milk
hahahaha
I'm two percent, bitch. Don't mess with the talent.
My 2 cents:
Simmons has always struck me as a super-dork who could smash anyone to bits in a sports arguement quoting useless stats, but whom you could annihilate in any physical sport.
Barstool Sports, on the other hand, provides me with daily witty banter, and white parties with lots of sluts.
Advantage: Barstool
absoluke, you trying to get people fired up again?
The thing that makes the Patriots dynasty so unique is that they usually do not have the most talented team (on paper) and do not dominate games. Yes, they have BB and Brady and the experience to pull out those type of games but in each of the SB years (2001 especially) they got breaks and clutch performances at critical times to win certain games. While it is assuring that we have that experience it by no means gurantees victory. Because we've had so many close postseason games, fans around here appreciate that and savor every victory.
Feeling fortunate when the Pats win the Super Bowl is a lot different than feeling entitled when the Yanks win the series.
"Being the big bully is a million times more fun than being the plucky underdog."
- I couldn't disagree more.
That being said, I don't think of the patriots as being a dominant team. They are far from the most talented, and although they are probably the best coached, they are still never considered clear cut favorites. btw, Colts are 3 point favorites this weekend... Go Pats!
U-Suck, since you're obviously new, the basic story is that El P loved Simmons, especially when he was in Boston. I believe Dunkenstein asked Simmons to throw a bone to a local boston guy trying to make a paper and give an interview. Simmons replied that he was trying not to overexpose himself, or limit his appearances or some crap. The problem is, he then made a cartoon of his life on ESPN.com, which sucked and was pulled, and did some other crap, and was all over the place. Pres didn't mind the turndown as much as the bullshit reasons which he did a 180 on. However, I remember El P blogging that he made some piece with Simmons a while back, maybe around the time when he broke the John Dennis drunken rant tape? There was an april fool's simmons make-up post once also, so I have mashed some Simmons/Pres history together. Bottom line- Pres loved his writing, his dealing with him have made him feel Simmons is a full-of-himself-douche, "duplicitous pond scum" if you will.
"Still, if the Pats really have turned into the football Yankees, then everyone outside of New England believes that ...
A.Rooting for the Patriots is like rooting for the house in blackjack.
B. An entire generation of fledgling NFL fans is being raised to root against them as we speak.
Just writing those last two sentences gave me the Manning Face. How could this be? How did we get here?"
This really sums up my entire arguement. I think this is a great thing. The pinnacle of being a sports fan really. Simmons thinks it stinks.
I think a lot of people question Simmons because he doesn't do the normal sportswriter routine and he's VERY opinionated. My bosses at the Globe hated him, they'd flip out on any co-op who even dared have the yellow background up on his or her computer.
To each his own, I think he's terrific (though he needs to cut back on the 10,000 word NBA columns), and let's face it...none of us are here without him.
If the Patriots are expected to win then why are we 3 point dogs? This just adds to the hypocracy that is the national media.
I find the 2006-07 Patriots to be a very exciting team. We invole so many different players that we become to a certain extent unpredictable.
As a side note the thing I love is when people say I write things because I have an ax to grind or an agenda. I've never done that. NEVER. When I'm writing with an ax to grind I always preface it. Even when I used to kill Simmons on a daily basis I would briefly explain why I hated him first.
But this has nothing to do with that. I just thought the article sucked. It was the main article on ESPN.com and was emailed to me 5 times today. Just like how I killed Borges yesterday, I killed Simmons today. Thought it was a bad article, that's all.
Also, I made it to the second round in his Intern Contest and his wife's pretty hot, so I'll defend him to the death.
Harry Colon
Thanks for the update and awesome name
it's a fairly accurate description of what happened without getting too involved. But I've explained it in detail many times. If you google us and simmons you can probably find the back story.
If anything, Barstool needs to life the "Brushes with Greatness" schtick he used to have on his digital city website. Nothing better than hearing about Randy from the Real World doing coke in the bathroom of the Cask. Love that shit.
"none of us are here without him." Couldn't be more true about you guys, Prez you can't deny that. It's ok to kill Borges because he is essentially the Shaughnessy of Patriots coverage - which makes him a grade A suckpot. If we strung you up the way you are stringing up Simmons for every bad article you wrote Prez, we'd have lynched you a long time ago.
hahaha Skim Milk
didn't the yankees overpay free agents in order to build their dynasty? whereas the Pats did the exact opposite. To me that makes a big difference.
re the yankee analogy. always better to be the hammer than the nail
I used to love Simmons but I feel like I read the samething from him over and over. Always referring to movies etc. Its old. It was a great analogy the first 100x he did it but he needs to try something new. Also hes a joke around the rest of sports media. He is constantly laughed upon and on sports talk radio people often bring him up but the hosts of the show always say how hes a joke and has no real knowledge. Now Im sure a lot of that is from jealously that he got big on page 2...But with all that being said I dont even read him anymore bc I felt its all the samething so I could be so wrong and he might have changed up...Ive been a few months Simmons free just like Ive been almost a week Rebello free!
Big Windy,
Again you have no idea what you're talking about. I havne't talked about Simmons in ages. The guy is the #1 writer on ESPN.com. If I write a negative commentary on an article he wrote once a year, that's out of bounds?
You're freaking crazy.
Elpresidente...I'm in agreement with you that a dynasty (or even a team that isn't necessarily a dynasty but is a For-or-Against team -- like the '01/'02 Lakers) makes sports and specific match-ups more interesting.
But for your two other main arguments:
1. Opposition to his friends' response to the victory versus your experience
and 2. the difference (or in your case, the preference) between routing for a underdog/favorite
...I just don't agree with...
In regards to the former, I don't think his point is that the winning ways of the Patriots have created boredom. I think he's saying that it's less of a surprise, and therefore, less of a commotion that they pull off a win like last week (than it would have 4 years ago). For me, the best I can explain it is that I didn't EXPECT the Pats to win at any point in the game, but I ALSO didn't fear them losing at any point. And that perspective HAS CHANGED since 2002/2003...
And as for the latter. A MILLION times better rooting for them now? No way. Nope. When the Patriots won their first Super Bowl, I was crammed on the B line ripping of "P-A-T-S PATS PATS PATS" from the Jets the entire way on my way to Govt Center where THOUSANDS flooded the streets. Granted, some of that had to do with the fact that it was their first championship. But why was it that crazy? Why was it THAT MUCH MORE intense than either of their next two? They were the underdog. 14-point underdogs. "THERE WAS NO WAY THEY CAN STOP THE RAMS." -Everyone
But they did it.
Rooting for a dynasty isn't better, more fun, or more enjoyable than rooting for an underdog. And vice versa. It's a different experience; the emotions are different.
But I tell you what...it's great to be able to experience both sides. I think his point is that Sunday's game made him realize he's moving from one to the other...
I must admit though, I cringe whenever people pick the Pats solely because of Brady and Belichick...shades of Tino Martinez picking the Yanks to come back in the ALDS, down 2-1, because "the ghosts were coming out". Let's try and be tangible.
Then again, a majority of the people picking Indy are doing so because "it's Peyton's time."
"Still, if the Pats really have turned into the football Yankees, then everyone outside of New England believes that ...
A.Rooting for the Patriots is like rooting for the house in blackjack.
B. An entire generation of fledgling NFL fans is being raised to root against them as we speak.
Just writing those last two sentences gave me the Manning Face. How could this be? How did we get here?"
That's a big IF at the beginning. He then goes on to explain why the Pats aren't the Yankees of the NFL. I think you read it wrong Prez.
Regardless of whether it's an "if" he's saying he wouldn't want the Pats to be perceived that way. I would. I think that's the best you can hope for. I want to root for the team that nobody thinks can lose.
R Deez: Justin Rebello how tall are you
JR: 5'2"
R Deez: Jesus H Christ I didn't know they stacked shit that high
R Deez: From now on you're Skim Milk
sorry it's just too funny you had an internship for the globe, made it to 2nd round of the Simmons internship thing (la de freakin da)and now you will be forever know as Skim Milk
Oh and you brag about drinking a six pack of Sam Adams Pale Ale
give me a break
oh man good stuff
R Deez: hahaha skim milk
JR: Who are you talking to?
I didn't drink the whole six-pack (I'm 5'11'' btw, which means I'm taller than your bun buddy Kiefer Sutherland).
It's amazing how jealous and petty you readers are...I've been to the mountaintop of Boston sports and y'all are in queue for the EEI Whiner Line. Something to think about.
The weird thing about his basketball articles is that I don't watch the Suns so I have no idea whether he's right on on the money or way off... But its clearly the sport he knows the most about and so the NBA material ends up making his best collumns, that I could care less about reading.
Further, I only weight 150 lbs, so yes I'm a lightweight. That's cool, with the money I save on beer I can put toward the NHL package.
Advantage: Rebello!
"I've been to the mountaintop of Boston sports"
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
"I didn't drink the whole six-pack "
hahahahahahaha
2 beers followed by a tall glass of skim milk
Rebello I dont even bother reading ur blogs anymore. And sorry to say I can pretty much guarentee ur gonna lose readers more and more every week. Its a shame bc a hockey/bruins blog had so mch potential but they picked the wrong writer. But keep on insulting ur readers, in the long run it should pay off...
And Billy ur 100% right. When I was always reading Simmons he def. knew his basketball more than any other sport.
Bill Simmons is the Luke Perry of sports writing.
He was really cool once but he's getting a little long in the tooth lately with a face for radio and a voice a drag queen would die for.
I think him and Greg Dickerson are the only NBA fans I know.
Will people please stop giving him credit for creating the idea of posting a column online, but if it wasn't for Simmons just think we wouldn't have the great Eric Wilbur to read. Whatever happened to that guy, does he still write?
Spazz, you know you read me every week...and if you're going to insult the blogger publically, the blogger should be able to insult you. Take it like a man, don't boycott the talent.
I'm having a great time with this repartee, and so should you.
Example: Bones' "little engine" comment was great...I'm stealing that!
70 comments and counting....evidently Simmons hasn't completely lost his fastball. He's still a skinny little douche, though.
I'm getting a lot of positive feedback here this afternoon, all right.
Simmons is a lightening rod for controversy. Always has been. If he didn't ask me to stop writing about him he probably would be in more often.
pres, i just never got the impression reading that article that Simmons felt like Pats fans were bored with winning. I thought his comparison to the Yankees was off base (Pats don't buy championships), and I think you both said some of the same things: Being a champion and being the team that everyone wants to be is far better than being the underdog. I felt like Simmons conveyed that also....
I don't know, I feel like you're making an argument against Simmons, but a lot of what you are saying is sort of what he said too. The only thing is Simmons said that he didnt get any phone calls after the game, but that could be because his friends don't like him, or some other reason.
If he didn't ask me to stop writing about him he probably would be in more often.
— elpresidente, Jan 19 2007, 4:12 pm
Is that true?
Justim, actually I havent read u since that last time u and I went back and forth...I personally have no problem if u insult me. I can take it...I just have issue with u really not knowing much about hockey thats all...So there is no point to read ur blog bc basically its all nonsense...No offense to u but anyone who watches one Bruins game once in a while and looks at stats and standings can do what u do...Thats the only problem I have with u...Other may not like the insulting tho thats all I was saying...Ur prob. a good guy and all that, but I dont even bother with ur blogs anymore bc again I just feel like u are talking thro ur ass...Good luck with it tho Im sure other readers disagree with me and like ur blog and think u have some hockey knowledge
As far as his main post goes no, teh Pats are not the Yankees.
1. The national media drools over Jeter and company, Fox's color comentator during their playoff experience break's down the twinkle in Jeter's eye, and they hire the 3rd basman's brother as their in booth annalyst. The national media and the NFL desperatly wich the Pats would start losing.
2. The other main difference is that the fans outside of New England would derive a perverse sense of joy in watching the pats lose. Don't confues the opinion of the national media with the fans. If anything they're polar opposites. If anything I'd say the Colts are way more like the Yankees than the Pats are. They just haven't won yet, or ever.
Maybe I'm an idiot because that's not the vibe I got. I got that he doesn't like being a fan of the team everybody just expects to win on a national level and is sick and tired off.
I disagree with that philosophy and I disagree that people are bored with the pats which I definitly thought was one of his main pts.
Shouldn't we be directing our anger toward the true disgrace of Page 2, namely Scoop Jackson?
Also I wouldn't want the Pats to be compared to the Yankees or myself to a Yankees fan ever. Ever. I know, everything you said makes perfect sense Prez, but I still want no part of it. I hate those guys that much.
Eric Wilbur kicks ass!!
"And if the Patriots can pull off another beauty on Sunday night, maybe my phone won't be ringing off the hook, and maybe we're headed for two weeks of "just shoot me, I'm so freaking tired of the Patriots" stories, and maybe we'd be as popular as the Russian hockey team in Lake Placid if the Saints make it to Miami. But you know what? Patriots fans have had it both ways, and it's much more fun being Michael Corleone than Fredo. Actually, it's much, much, much, much MUCH more fun. So keep ragging on us all you want. You'd trade places with us in a heartbeat and you know it."
Sounds as if he likes being a Pats fan.
Dirt Dog sucks, too.
Rebello, youre 5'11'' and 150lbs? Did you play hockey or any sport for that matter?
I played soccer, baseball and your mother.
5'11" 150 is 10 pounds away from an Ox-Fam commercial.
Comon Justin youre better than that. Someone who has been to the mountaintop should bring better stuff.
JR, I think what Gillis is trying to say, is that you shouldn't be doing a lights out dance all over his mom's bush.
"Act like you've been there."
Wow. I'm agreeing with JR. Ever since he went to boston.com he has sucked. That website is worthless.
I agree Simmons is getting old, and he is almost becomeing a self-parody. Being and NBA fan, I think he should stick to that full time. He has become disconnected from Boston, obviously, but he still knows his shit when it comes to basketball.
Yes, he asked me to stop writing about him and I did. At least on a personal level which is what I used to do rather than criticize his writing since I love his writing. Didn't like this article though.
Rumor round the stool is JR was the skim milk boy for the basketball team
Soccer and Baseball Justin...Not bad at all...What college did u play for?
Classic - TB Lip Md.
BTW I dip a ton, I may need a consult in the future.
i dont write very often. but i'd like to jump on the 'rebello is a tool bandwagon'
Mike I agree...Simmons doesnt even live in Boston anymore...I said it earlier but Ill say it again...At first I love Simmons with all his movie analogies but after the 1000x he did it, its just like, alright we get it, do something different now...Thats why he doesnt post as much as he used to, bc he has no new ideas!
Yeah, and that Henry David Thoreau sucked ever since he moved out of Walden Pond..
Simmmons is just another example of how you can't write about something unless you live in it...
So you've been to the fucking mountain top!?! What- interning at the Globe?!? BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! More like the muffin top, shithead.
that oxfam line killed me
With Rebello we are definitely dealing with a long time sufferer of the "Napolean complex" Its funny cause Jr as a nickname works perfectly.
Too bad he peaked in 05, its all downhill after you reach the mountaintop! But at least he played my mom....
ElPres, it just seems like your snatch is a little sandy from your alleged interactions with Simmons. Alright well I'm going to head to Deadspin so I can see what will be on Barstool later today.
you're just jealous that he's doing what you're TRYING to do on a larger, national level and is wealthy because of it.
"Now here's where a slight dose of hypocrisy comes in. We spend so much time complaining about underachieving superstars, overpaid and overhyped players, incompetent GMs, rookie flops, dreadful officiating, troublemakers, thugs, players and coaches doing/saying dumb things, bad trades and signings, annoying announcers and writers, and overrated teams getting too much credit -- by the way, I do as much complaining and mocking as anyone, I'm not absolving myself here -- that I'm starting to wonder if we'll ever fully embrace a special team anymore. Are we too cynical? Are we too desperate to poke fun at everything? Has being a "fan" morphed into something else? Has the fan-sports dynamic started to become a little unhealthy?"
Ironic since thats what seems to have happened to him in that he was once considered fresh and one of the best writers and is now is consistently being accused of losing his fastball
"It's becoming a formula -- nobody thinks the Pats can pull it off, the odds are impossible, MY GOD THEY DID IT AGAIN! -- which is unfortunate because formulas become boring pretty quickly."
Strange admission since thats probably one of his biggest criticisms... his articles have become a formula
You know Simmons is posting here under a pseudonym, I wonder which one of you he is?
I'd say the Simmons pseudonym is Rubello
I really enjoy Simmons' articles and I think his movie/pop culture references are phenemonal. I am parapharsing but lines like "I think Curt Schilling may have killed someone" crack me up. I don't think he has lost touch. His Boston sensibilities permeate everything he writes. I think sometimes success, whether its a sports teams'(Pats) or an individuals'(Simmons), invites criticism, sometimes warranted but often not, and often jealousy. I think this may be the case with Simmons.
"It's amazing how jealous and petty you readers are...I've been to the mountaintop of Boston sports and y'all are in queue for the EEI Whiner Line. Something to think about."
— Justin Rebello, Jan 19 2007, 4:02 pm
"Don't take your frustration out on a talented writer who's going to leave you all in the dust."
— Justin Rebello, Jan 19 2007, 10:23 am
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just winding people up, here.
I can't believe I missed this. Out for much of the afternoon.
Simmmons is better than anyone on this site. How can this even be a question? I love Chisholm's writing, and several others are good (not JR), but you guys are not close. I thought the column was good, even if he repeats at time. I bet no one called him because they were all watching 24!!
I can't believe how many people are coming out of the woodwork on Skim Milk. I am free of him, though it looks like I missed something with the Pale Ale episode. Prez, aren't you embarrassed yet? Even free is a bad deal sometimes. On the other hand, maybe you should keep him so we will have someone to abuse after the SB until spring training starts.
Is Bill Simmons and Todd McShay twins????
Hey fuckface R Deez,
Double and triple spacing between your hateful fucking comments is pathetic. See if you can bring the heat using the amount of space your piss takes up in a single space environment. Go fuck yourself. If you have any fucking balls, you'll let me know when you will be at Trivia Night. Otherwise, keep it to your fucking self.
simmons is a faggot used to be a must read now is borges if i ever had a chance to write for espn would never sell out like this piece of shit i hate simmons in other words dont move to la if u want to be a representation of boston sports go follow the clippers and the pats on the nfl package or watch every game like a real fan in boston simmons is a fuckin fake boston fan from la faggot he would get his ass kicked in gillette excelpt i would bet he woiuld act like a boston fan if he came back here if anyone sees him around here kick his fuckin ass
oh and by the way if this faggot is still readable elton brand agrees o used to wait for simmons articles now we just make fun of this la faggot
HAHAHA I love it spazz!!! That "what college did you play for" comment is priceless. You KNOW he never played sports in college. He was probably a gym class superstar or something. I like the idea of a Bruins blog as well. I am a f'n die hard. But JR lost his credibility long ago. By the way IF the pats win this year especially gainst the saints I think everybody outside of New England may hate the Pats. Who cares though. We have to enjoy this while we can cuz eventually it will come to an end.
Post Your Comments
Login to post your comments.
If you're not registered on the message board already, you can register here.
Sight Unseen, the Best Movie of 2007
Here is the IMDB description for "Grindhouse":
An homage to exploitation B-movie thrillers that combines two feature-length segments into one double-bill designed to replicate the grind house theatergoing experience of the 70s and 80s. In "Death Proof," a psycho named Stuntman Mike (Kurt Russell) stalks and kills beautiful women with his car. In "Planet Terror," a small-town sheriffs' department has to deal with an outbreak of murderous, infected people called "sickos." A gun-legged woman named Cherry (Rose McGowan) and her martial arts-wielding partner (Freddy Rodriguez) take on the zombie army. The two films will be fused together by fake movie trailers.
Psycho stuntman...beautiful women...murderous sickos...a gun-legged woman...zombie army...martial arts...Rose McGowan....I'm not sure you could fit more elements that I want to see into a single plot summary. This movie could open the same night as "Barstool Sports: the Motion Picture" and I'd see this first.
Arguing with Logic

I've given this a lot of thought, poured over the numbers, listened to the pundits, and talked to everyone I've come in contact with. And here's what I've come up with.
Reasons the Patriots can beat the Colts Sunday:
- The Patriots outscored their opponents by 148 points in 2006, the Colts were +67
- The Colts gave up 5.33 yds per rushing attempt, worst in the NFL since 1961
- The Pats had the 5th best rush defense in the NFL and 6th best overall. The Colts were 21st overall.
- The Pats recorded 44 sacks, the Colts had 25.
- Indy were last in the league in opponents 3rd down conversions at 47%.
- New England's defense surrendered 10 passing TDs and had 22 INTs. The Colts had 16 and 15.
- In the red zone, the Pats were 2nd offensively, 3rd defensively. The Colts were 7th and 29th.
- Brady is 10-0 in domes and 13-1 in the playoffs.
Reasons the Colts can beat the Patriots:
- Indy have a really good pass offense.
- Adam Vinatieri is a great kicker.
- "It's Peyton Manning's year."
At least those are the arguments I keep hearing.
It finally Snowed
Can you believe it's over half way through January and it is just now snowing in Boston? It's strange enough that the Pats are about to play their 3rd straight playoff game in nice weather. Anyway here's some fun video of people losing control of their cars in the snow and ice...Enjoy.
Has Patriots-Colts Surpassed Red Sox-Yankees? One Reader Thinks So.
Reader submitted blog from Dan L.-
Maybe I’m a little shortsighted in saying this, or maybe it's because when I
hear the words “Hot Stove” I think of football season. But, I’m going to make a bold statement here, one that might shock the masses (and Mass). OK, deep breath. The Patriots-Colts rivalry has surpassed that of the Red Sox and Yankees. Take a minute and let that marinate like a stale fart.
The Sox/Yanks rivalry peaked during the 2003 and 2004 seasons. Tempers were boiling over in every series between the two storied franchises. In 2003, we saw Pedro toss Zim around like a rotten pumpkin and an all out brawl, the likes of we haven’t seen since. And then, the 2003 season tragically ends with Aaron Boone's homerun in the ALCS.
The angst from that season carried over to 2004, and in most dramatic fashion, the Sox beat the Yanks (in Yankee Stadium no less) in a Game 7 situation, cementing the greatest comeback in sports history. Now, fast forward to 2007. The Sox/Yanks rivalry hasn’t come close to resembling what it was just a few short years ago. Now the biggest controversy is which team is going to spend the most. Personally, I liked it better when the Sox could always play the “We don’t spend nearly as much money as the Yanks” card. But that’s been thrown out the window this year. The Sox are burning money like Schottenheimer burns timeouts. Also, I can’t remember the last time the Sox brawled with the Yanks. In ’03-’04, these teams came to the games prepared to fight. Even after Judas Damon signed with the Yanks we haven't seen anything close to a scuffle, disappointing Sox fans to no end.
The Pats-Colts rivalry may not have that same type of intensity as the Sox-Yanks did in its prime, but it’s getting there. This Sunday will mark the third time in four years the Pats and Colts have met in the playoffs. Each of the previous two games featured a Patriots win, a frustrated Manning and ultimately the Lombardi trophy ending up in Brady’s hands. As Pats fans, we’ve had it good. We can’t complain about anything for the next 20 years (but we will anyway). Colts fans on the other hand, well, they’re frustrated to say the least. They’ve got the new Marino, one of the highest payrolls (a payroll that will kill them when Manning is done) and the inability to win the big one. So why is this rivalry surpassing the Sox-Yanks, when the Pats obviously have the upper hand?
Simple, the Patriots are the alpha dog in the league right now, yet no one wants to admit it. Every preseason every analyst from here to China picks the Colts to win the Super Bowl. And every time the Colts get close, it’s the Pats who shut the door on their Super Bowl hopes. Then there’s this: Peyton Manning is the media's darling, he’s the poster boy of what a great quarterback should be (at least in the national spotlight) but here in good old New England he’s just an overrated chump who can’t beat our golden boy Tom. Tommy Touchdowns was once again overlooked for the Pro Bowl this year (which is fine by me, since the Robert Edwards fiasco), while Peyton is starting the most meaningless game in sports.
Do you think Brady cares about making that squad? Or do you think he’d rather be celebrating another Super Bowl victory? As far as rivalries go, it all comes down to these two guys, the ultimate team player vs. the money hungry record breaker. Lets get it on!
The Man Who Shook Up Vegas
A reader sent this story along. It was published in the January 5th edition of the Wall Street Journal. It's a very long read but pretty interesting for people who like gambling....
LAS VEGAS -- Veteran sports bettors and bookmakers are not prone to fantastic notions. They like to think that everything new is just something old in a fashionable suit.
But this fall, the stereotype no longer fit. Years of studied cynicism gave way to breathless talk. Las Vegas had a mystery on its hands.
Each Thursday morning at precisely 10 a.m. Nevada time, every major casino sports betting operation in the world from here to Costa Rica was being simultaneously pounded by thousands of bettors wagering millions of dollars on the same few college football games. Odder still, most of these lock step bets were turning out to be winners, costing the casinos a fortune.
Click here to read entire story...
Thanks to Ty for sending it along.
Another reason to look forward to Sunday

TMZ.com: TMZ has exclusively learned that Miss USA Tara Conner will be getting out of rehab on Sunday, and that Miss Universe officials are "licking their chops" because her imminent release will cause a "news frenzy."
We're also told that people who run the facility say she's back on track. Conner spent the last few weeks at a treatment center in Pennsylvania, after the Donald decided not to fire her for her wild, hard-partying antics and dalliances with multiple men, as TMZ first reported in December.
Since then, two of her fellow contestants in the pageant, Miss Nevada Katie Rees and Miss New Jersey Ashley Harder have been forced to turn in their crowns.

UB has heard a rumor she's headed strait to Justin Rebello's for some Sam Adams Pale Ale and the Bruins...


"Boobs"
Miss MA Doesn't Get It
Inside Track - In an NFL beauty contest, newly crowned Miss Massachusetts Despina Delios thinks Tom Brady[ stats] is “average.” Which leads us to wonder where the Lynn homegal is hanging out!
“Tom Brady is a good-looking gentleman, but average,” Desi told the Track. “Honestly, everybody goes around having crushes on celebrities, but I am not that kind of person. I guess I really haven’t looked at him to form an opinion.”
“I don’t think anything,” said the Miss USA wannabe. “I don’t know.”
Any thoughts on Tara Conner, who is spending 30 days of her Miss USA reign in rehab???
“If I won the title, I would never have to give (pageant poohbah Donald Trump) a reason to give me a second chance,” said Desi. “But I think Tara, by going to rehab, and (Donald) giving her a second chance, was a wonderful thing.”
Who picked this chick to represent MA? She seems like a real wet blanket. How can she say Tom Brady is average looking? First of all, that’s a slap in the face to me and every other Pats fan in New England. Secondly, what is she on drugs or something? Tom Brady isn’t average at anything. He’s fucking Gisele for god sakes. And just as an FYI, Peyton Manning is a disgusting slob. So get with the times would you? Newsflash: The Pats are playing the Colts in the AFC Championship on Sunday. Get your head out of your ass and start representing MA the right way instead of sitting there and saying nothing. I give Miss MA a negative 23 percent chance of getting out of the first round in the Miss USA competition next year. She is as boring as boring can be. Apparently she didn’t get the memo that the Miss USA competition is about chicks getting drunk, stripping and fucking. There is no room for Ms. Vanilla from Lynn MA.
And to think I would have offered her a spot on our cover….
Trot, Trot to Cleveland
ESPN.COM: Free-agent outfielder Trot Nixon has agreed to a one-year, $3 million deal with the Cleveland Indians, ESPN.com's Peter Gammons reports.
Nixon, who has spent his entire pro baseball career with the Boston Red Sox organization and was popular with the team's fans for his gritty playing style, was not offered arbitration by the team after spending eight years as its starting right fielder.
In 982 career games, Nixon has a .278 batting average with 133 home runs and 523 RBIs. He hit .357 in Boston's four-game sweep of the St. Louis Cardinals in the 2004 World Series and delivered a key bases-clearing triple in Game 4.
There are two moments that immediately stick out when it comes to Trot:
The 2000 Pedro-Clemens showdown at Yankoff Stadium where Trot's 2 run homer in the top of the 9th was the only runs scored in the classic game. Clemens struck out 13, Pedro 9. The Yankoffs loaded the bases in the bottom of the 9th but the Sox got out of it, in what still is the best game UB has ever been to.
Game 4 of the 2004 World Series, where with a 3-0 count Nixon comes with in a foot of hitting a 3 run home run. Instead his double scores 2 and the Sox win the game 3-0 and sweep the series. Rumors persist that he did not have the green light.
So long Trot. UB always loved his heart, but the guy just couldn't stay on the field or hit a lefty to save his life...
Breaking News: Nixon Cashes in Big Time
Free-agent outfielder Trot Nixon has agreed to a one-year, $3 million deal with the Cleveland Indians, ESPN.com's Peter Gammons reports.

One year, $3 million for a ten-year veteran? It just doesn't get any lower than that. Seriously, this is like the top salesman at Dunder-Mifflin working the floor at Staples.
Here are Nixon's final averages with the Sox, not counting his first two seasons, when he only had a cup of coffee:
- Per season: G: 120, Avg: .278, HR: 17, RBI: 65, SLG: .478
- Per 162 Games: HR: 22, RBI: 86, BB: 75, K: 102
It's hard now to remember the time when more than half the fans in Boston considered Trot the tough, clutch, star-in-the-making that we wouldn't trade for anybody. Early on he did have his clutch hits, and was a certifiable Clemens killer. But the fact is that between being injured and having to be protected against lefties, Nixon was only good for about 70 games a year for the last half of his time in Boston. And I'll argue that for every boneheaded miscue that Manny made, baserunning blunders or forgetting how many outs there are or whatever, Trot made one as well. All the eye black and dirty hats in the world couldn't make up for that.
I call that we all have to do a shot today every time Peter Gammons says that Trot is one of the truly great people in the game.
Marino does it again
There was an amazing stat on HBO's Inside the NFL Wednesday night...During the Patriots 12-1 playoff run since the 2001-02 season, dickhead Dan Marino has picked against them 7 times. Those picks included all 3 AFC Championships and 2 of the 3 Super Bowls. Marino's fellow co-hosts commented that they knew he hated the Jets but didn't know he hated the Patriots too. Marino replied, trying to joke around, that he hated the whole division.
During the 2004 playoffs Tom Brady actually called Marino out on Inside the NFL, noting that he never picks the Patriots in a personal message. Brady said, "Well have to keep winning until he picks us."
The funniest thing about these series of anti-Pats picks is that during the Super Bowl XXXVI preview show back in 2002, Marino predicted a close game with the Patriots winning 20-17 on a last second Vinatieri field goal. The funny part is that after they shot the scene Marino made them re-shoot him predicting a Rams blowout because he didn't want to be wrong and look like an idiot at his new job.
Of course Danny boy did us all a favor, picking the Colts this Sunday.
Super Memories

It's in the basement. The VHS copy of Super Bowl XXXVI. It's been a while since your Uncle Buck has put it in, so NFL Network was kind enough to pull it out for him and air it as part of a series of original Super Bowl broadcasts on the network. As UB is sure many in Stoolville did last night, the game was TiVoed and zipped through to the highlights, but while watching there was several things that struck UB about the event:
- Pat Summerall and John Madden are doing the game for Fox. UB completely forgot how AWFUL Summerall was at this point. Even just zipping through you can hear Summerall refer to Warner as Faulk and during the Ty Law interception, Mike Vrabel as Willie McGinest. He steps all over Madden's lines throughout and of course there was the end of the game...He comments that Vinatieri missed a field goal in pre-game that he hits as it is being replayed ("Well he pulled that one in pre-game, but most of them he hit in pre-game and he doesn't miss many...") and then delivers the worst "dramatic ending" call in the history of sports. Vinatieri's kick: "And it's right down the pike" (long pause, checking his notes...) "Adam Vinatieri" (long pause, check the clock) "No time on the clock, (Pause) and the Patriots have won Super Bowl 36." (Pause) "Unbelievable." By the time he got the last word out Brady had already received the keys to his new MVP car. What a sad way for one of the all time great broadcast duos to go out.
- Even though Fox had been doing the NFL for several years now, they still had an awful broadcast. Especially the moments after Adam's game winner...UB really hopes that director was fired. After the game winning kick the camera shots include: Seldom used receiver Charles Johnson who is talking to the camera, Patriots Center Mike Compton (#77) rolling around, a Rams player on one knee saying "damn", a zoom in of confetti, Mike Martz looking like a zombie and then a few other random Patriots linemen. Only in replays do you see Brady slapping Bledsoe's shoulder pads or the reaction of Vinatieri and Ken Walter. They completely missed Belichick's embrace with Lawyer Milloy and his daughter, which was caught by NFL Films.
- The graphics are amazingly different from today. The scoreboard bug at the top takes over at least 1/5th of the screen, while the camera is more zoomed in than today, making the players and the field look bigger.
- Just before the game begins the Patriots are introduced as a team, it still gives UB chills.
- Brady looks SO freaking young. He looks like an 18 year old when they introduce the offense.
- UB remembers waking up that morning in his new apartment, just lying in bed thinking "If they can just win this game, everything will be different." Think about it. In February 2002, the last title UB and Boston had enjoyed was the 1986 Celtics. We were hanging our hats on an AFC title in 1996-97 and a Stanley Cup appearance in 1990, that's it for the decade. At the time the Celtics were improving, but no one expected them to do anything amazing (although they did reach the Eastern Conference Finals later that season) and the Bruins were in the same boat. The Red Sox were taking steps to get better but we were celebrating more about the Yankoffs losing the 2001 World Series than we were about anything the Sox had done. About 13 hours after waking up, life was VERY different for UB and Boston.
Those are just a few things that popped in to UB's head...UB is sure that the Stoolies will add there own memories from the game and the times below, but it still stands out for UB as perhaps the happiest and most unbelievable sports moment of all time...When UB woke up this morning, he flipped on the TiVo and noticed that the NFL Network re-broadcast of Super Bowl XXXVIII recorded at some point over night...Can't wait to re-live that one too.
Best Alibi Ever
Marco Borriello plays for Milan in the Italian soccer league. When he tested positive for performance enhancers, he did what any smart athlete does: he said it was somebody else's fault.

But Marco is light years ahead of our doofusy American athletes. While Barry Bonds is blaming Mark Sweeney and Gary Sheffield is blaming Barry Bonds and Shawne Merriman is blaming team doctors, Borriello blames his astonishingly beautiful Argentine model girlfriend Belen Rodriguez.
Borriello claims that Rodriguez was taking a creme to treat a vaginal infection, and the creme had steroids in it, and he ingested some because well, he's a man, and she's a woman, and there two young kids in love and somethin' somethin'...
Marco Borriello is now the leader in the clubhouse for 2007 Sportman of the Year. How great is this alibi? "Sorry fellas, not my fault...I was muff diving. On my model girlfriend. Couldn't help myself." Even if it's chemically impossible, all any guy in the league office can say is "Good for you" and vote for no disciplinary action.
Some NSFW pictures are here, here, here and a whole calendar's worth is here.None of these should dissuade any guy from risking a postitive steroid test, infection or no infection.
I got this from Fark, who linked it from Rumorwhore. So if you want to say you read it on Deadspin or Withleather or something, just shaddup.
Hot or Not: Kari Byron
This is Kari Byron of the Discovery Channel's "Mythbusters." I wish I could've found better pictures of her, frankly even the FHM shots below I don't think do her justice. She might just be one of those women that doesn't photgraph as well as she should.
I think the reasons I really like this chick are:
- She's a redhead. And we're all in agreement I think that redheads are either really smoking, or make you recoil in horror. Kari is smoking.
- She can build and fix stuff. Smart chicks who can actually use tools instead of just trying to hold the world together with duct tape like me are a turn-on.
- She's comfortable around nerds. I mean, she comes across like the girl from the engineering department who could probably date the captain of the football team, but give the tech geeks hope they might have a shot at her.
- She can chill beer with a fire extinguisher.





And here's a N really SFW one for good measure.
Borges Talks Out Both Sides
The Globe's Ron Borges has long since retired the trophy as the biggest Patriot hater in Boston. Since the day Bill Belichick took over he's criticized every personnel move, taken umbrage with every free agent they've let walk, ripped every free agent they've signed, second guessed every draft pick, and questioned every public statement the
team has made.
The only competition Dr. Evil has had for the top (bottom?) spot was the Herald's Kevin Mannix, who once famously called Belichick "duplicitous pond scum." But after the Pats started collecting championships, even Mannix saw the light (then got fired). Borges is hanging onto his loathing of the Pats like a member of Opus Dei, sworn to protect the Big Lie.
Even three Super Bowls and the best winning record of any coach in the playoffs in history wouldn't force Ron off his mark. One thing you could say in his favor was at least he was consistent. Until now. Last night Borges was on FSN's "4 Downs with Felger" show. When Felger went around the panel and asked for their final predictions for Sunday's game, Borges went with the Colts. Specifically, he said he agrees with SI.com's Don Banks, that the Pats won't be able to stop the Colts wide receivers.
And here's what he's saying on MSNBC.com:
Defense, Brady will lift Pats over Colts, again
Indianapolis isn't about to end its playoff drought against New England
...the Patriots gave up a franchise record-low 237 points, an average of 14.8 points per game. That ranked second in the league in the only defensive statistic that matters and that has changed little in the playoffs.
Going into Sunday's showdown for the AFC Championship in Indianapolis, New England is third among AFC playoff teams in points allowed, having given up 18.5 per game. What may be just as critical is that while their defense has been stout all year, they are the AFC's leading scorers in the playoffs, averaging slightly over 30 points per game in their wins over the Jets and Chargers. That may not make them better than their best Super Bowl championship teams but it just may make them good enough to add more jewelry to their safe deposit boxes.
du·plic·i·tous adj "marked by deliberate deceptiveness especially by pretending one set of feelings and acting under the influence of another"







i thought this was one of his better articles. and i really cant wait until his wifes recap of the upcoming donut trip.