Ludicrously hot. If you can't say you would destroy a chick that looks like this, for any reason other than you knew it was 100% guaranteed you would get a disease that would kill you, you're a shit talking moron.
VISIBLE tats on a chick = low class (ie. arms, legs, chest, upper back
Because you know she can't have a good job.
What if they're in places covered by clothing? I think differently on that matter.
Hofasho- Can't have a good job? You kidding me bro? She has 3 jobs- Blow, Hand, and... kitchen? You get the idea. Everything else a chick does just results in more talking...
i love how these dick catchers are saying tats on a chick means they're low class when she's raking in tons of money and they're sitting here ripping on her over the internet and probably haven't left the house in months because they're too scared to interact with a real girl and are too busy jerking off to "high class" girls with no tats who fuck for money like she does TATS ON CHICKS=JIZZ DRIZZLES
The fact that you call it a "skrillex" haircut shows how much of a toolbox you are. Figures it comes from the guy who was given the task of doing a write up on Adam yauch and instead posted the worst blog in the history of the internet.
Ay carumba! Daddy likes. @bdemps, I just spit coffee ll over my desk reading that. Now can someone please be a team player and post a video link so I can go to the bathroom and have a wake-up whack off session?
by dwyanewadesherpes on December 7, 2012 at 3:11 pm
She posted at our school's online newspaper,Indiana Daily Student, in April ripping a columnisst over how porn is bad for you and all that. I replied to her that I masturbated to her the other day, she lol'ed and thanked me. True story.
Top 2 Comments
35 comments Sort by Popularity Sort by Date
Leave a Comment