by B Luc » Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:54 pm
Your counterpoint is from 3 years ago. What exactly would you like people to say?
Also my "outrage", as you put it, isn't about his "attack". My outrage is that he blatantly refused to admit he was wrong in the time-line of things and continued to push the issue. Making it something about politics. He's not in the position to know what the current POTUS knows, but if he continues to swing wildly whenever something happens he'll end up sounding more like Sarah Palin and less like a legitimate candidate.
I'm personally not sold on Obama and he doesn't have my vote guaranteed for November, but Romney seems to be working really hard to not win votes of the independents like myself. His trickle down economics theory doesn't jive with me because it's not going to work short term, and there's no guarantee it will work long term. Cutting taxes for anyone (which I would LOVE) when there is such a huge deficit lacks complete logic unless he's keeping the "important" piece of that strategy under his hat until post-election. If you remove regulation from wall street we're gonna have the same thing that happened in 2008. Give people who spend their lives making money on the market absolutely free reign and greed will creep in like a cold november wind. And that bitch isn't going away til everybody is sick and broke.
Also, good for Romney for having faith and religion. But we don't live in a theocracy. Who is the President to tell someone they can't love another person and express that love through marriage?
Whores til proven otherwise. And they so rarely do.