Section 40 wrote:rearadmiral wrote: If you're friends with any gay people or women, voting R does them no favors.
How so? Please elaborate.
I am curious how you will spin the GOP not intent on voting to set gay and woman's rights back 50 years
Section 40 wrote:rearadmiral wrote: If you're friends with any gay people or women, voting R does them no favors.
How so? Please elaborate.
AY wrote:mcm wrote:wife's cousin is gay but thats about it
I do believe in gay rights though (see chick fil a thread)
AY has tons of gay friends but went to Chick Fil A day....go figure that one out.
No I didn't. I never said I did. I won't wait in lines like that to eat anywhere.
lugnutz wrote:Our talk was brief but she seems cool.

lugnutz wrote: I am curious how you will spin the GOP not intent on voting to set gay and woman's rights back 50 years
Section 40 wrote:rearadmiral wrote: If you're friends with any gay people or women, voting R does them no favors.
How so? Please elaborate.
rearadmiral wrote:Less government, my ass.

rearadmiral wrote:The GOP's vehement opposition to two gay adults getting married.
Their desire to do away with Planned Parenthood, desire to overturn Roe V. Wade, belief that rape victims should have the baby because it's a "blessing", utterly head-shaking 'knowledge' about how the female body works. The list goes on and on and on.
Less government, my ass.
Section 40 wrote:George Bush was President for 8 years and is quite religious, why did all these catastrophic human rights violations that Republicans will foist upon the country not happen during his reign of terror?
Section 40 wrote:How exactly is Mitt Romney going to accomplish this? Specifically Roe vs Wade. Romney has a way of overturning the Supreme Court?
Section 40 wrote:Knowledge about the female anatomy? You mean the buffoon in Missouri vying for office speaks for all Republicans? Please. There are a lot of people with opinions on gay marriage but apparently only Republicans will start the witch hunt to keep them down.
Section 40 wrote:Scott Brown is Republican yet was the first one to speak out regarding the aforementioned Missouri buffoon, how can this be? According to your logic all Republicans are goose stepping Nazi's but it's a little more complicated than what you write.

rearadmiral wrote:
Less government, my ass.
B Luc wrote:The issue with that fantasty land platform is that a large number of people are idiots and will vote for this wonderful utopia ushered in by a Mormon and some dude who wants to control every vagina in the country, but in the fun kinky kind of way.
And that's not to say I think Obama has done a bang up job, I'm a realist. I'd give him a C+/B- grading on a curve. But when you have a majority of congress being completely against compromise then you have a serious problem.
Also, people who cast their votes based upon a promise to lower wealth folks taxes are insane. That money the rich would save doesn't trickle down immediately, if ever. It goes into Cayman Island accounts or into additions to a house, or a new car, or into the stock market. But it rarely trickles down.
And plus, the fact that congress refuses to realize that stall tactics regarding debt/spending/taxes, etc. will send the world into another economic downturn. Their inaction affects the psyche's of people who want to invest. If it turns into a fire sale because people don't want to lose what they have in the market...well we're all fucked.
I wouldn't be surprised if there's another revolutionary/civil war, centered in D.C. & NYC in the next 15 years.
@BS1: Yep. Make sure the little one gets the best education possible. And that she can shoot. That's her generations only hope.

Users browsing this forum: NomeTeebaldob and 1 guest