ELIMINATOR 2011
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by AY » Sat Oct 08, 2011 1:52 pm
That's who I'm rolling with this week.
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing, and you're still fit and ready, and you know you own his ass."
-Former Bama LB Cory Reamer on Coach Cochran's training program
-Former Bama LB Cory Reamer on Coach Cochran's training program
-
AY - Not As Awesome as I think!
- Posts: 6654
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:31 pm
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by mcm » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:25 am
going with Lions and hoping for a NYG loss
first MNF home game for them in ages, and their D-line should be able to get to Cutler. Thats the theory anyway.
first MNF home game for them in ages, and their D-line should be able to get to Cutler. Thats the theory anyway.
lugnutz wrote:Our talk was brief but she seems cool.
-
mcm - Title Town
- Posts: 7569
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:51 pm
- Location: Room 112
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by Ted Striker » Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:17 pm
87 of the 108 people left in the pool i'm in were bounced today. 80 of them by the giants. Thank you seahawks
Fundamentals are a crutch for the talentless
-
Ted Striker - Serious Stoolie
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:26 pm
- Location: Out of Pocket
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by BS1 » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:41 am
Mr. X wrote:BS1, your boys are the overwhelming bandwagon pick on Ducey this week. Should I be worried?
ummm. yes??
It is what it is......
-
BS1 - Not As Awesome as I think!
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:05 pm
- Location: 2-0 in the SB vs. the Pats
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by AY » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:08 am
I've always hated the Giants.
I had it narrowed down to 3 picks and two of them lost.
I had it narrowed down to 3 picks and two of them lost.
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing, and you're still fit and ready, and you know you own his ass."
-Former Bama LB Cory Reamer on Coach Cochran's training program
-Former Bama LB Cory Reamer on Coach Cochran's training program
-
AY - Not As Awesome as I think!
- Posts: 6654
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:31 pm
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by Mr. X » Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:52 pm
giants were the primary reason the Ducey undefeated list went from 387 to 62.
The Orangemen are just a rock-solid, consistent winner that hasn't suffered a losing season since 1968-69.
-
Mr. X - Alt-Tab Master
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:49 pm
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by mcm » Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:06 pm
survive and advance with Balt
(slicks pool)
(slicks pool)
lugnutz wrote:Our talk was brief but she seems cool.
-
mcm - Title Town
- Posts: 7569
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:51 pm
- Location: Room 112
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by AY » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:23 pm
And then there were 3............
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing, and you're still fit and ready, and you know you own his ass."
-Former Bama LB Cory Reamer on Coach Cochran's training program
-Former Bama LB Cory Reamer on Coach Cochran's training program
-
AY - Not As Awesome as I think!
- Posts: 6654
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:31 pm
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by BS1 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:50 pm
the eagles and giants eliminated probably 75 % of the pool this yr, lol
It is what it is......
-
BS1 - Not As Awesome as I think!
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:05 pm
- Location: 2-0 in the SB vs. the Pats
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by BS1 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:41 pm
and the seahawks pulling the upset leaves one person standing for 1880 donuts....dude has GB going tomorrow against the Vikes. If the Vikes dont go and do something stupid he takes it all....if the Vikes upset the Pack then I have a 9 way split, lol
It is what it is......
-
BS1 - Not As Awesome as I think!
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:05 pm
- Location: 2-0 in the SB vs. the Pats
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by mcm » Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:30 pm
BS1 wrote:and the seahawks pulling the upset leaves one person standing for 1880 donuts....dude has GB going tomorrow against the Vikes. If the Vikes dont go and do something stupid he takes it all....if the Vikes upset the Pack then I have a 9 way split, lol
fucking Eagles....I almost emailed you to change my pick at like noon when I heard Desean was inactive. No clue if you would have accepted it or not. Not looking good for Minny tonight. Pretty awesome outcome for whoever the guy is that took Green Bay this week.
lugnutz wrote:Our talk was brief but she seems cool.
-
mcm - Title Town
- Posts: 7569
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:51 pm
- Location: Room 112
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by Mr. X » Tue Nov 15, 2011 4:41 pm
eagles and ravens decimated the Ducey pool. The Eagles handed me my 2nd loss. Out of 739 there are 6 remaining undefeated entries.
The Orangemen are just a rock-solid, consistent winner that hasn't suffered a losing season since 1968-69.
-
Mr. X - Alt-Tab Master
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:49 pm
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by lugnutz » Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:34 pm
Only two loses this week both came at the hands of the fucking NY teams.
2011 Canning Bowl Beer Pong Champion!
- lugnutz
- I post a lot
- Posts: 23575
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:50 pm
- Location: Laconia Smithsonian Museum
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by Mr. X » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:40 am
In 3 years of the Ducey pool had my best performance to date, lasting until week 17 (fucking Tebow). Both of the undefeated teams picked Pittsburgh this past weekend, so now there's 12 left with 1 loss and 66 with 2 losses out of 739 that started the year.
The Orangemen are just a rock-solid, consistent winner that hasn't suffered a losing season since 1968-69.
-
Mr. X - Alt-Tab Master
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:49 pm
Re: ELIMINATOR 2011
by Mr. X » Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:15 pm
6 entries finish the year with one loss. they split $72,900 six ways. The other $1,000 went to the dude who survived the longest with 2 losses. This person got his 2nd loss in week 5.
The Orangemen are just a rock-solid, consistent winner that hasn't suffered a losing season since 1968-69.
-
Mr. X - Alt-Tab Master
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:49 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests