lugnutz wrote:Unless you think you think you can't find a way to earn a greater rate of return then the government you better be taking the lump sum.
What?
lugnutz wrote:Unless you think you think you can't find a way to earn a greater rate of return then the government you better be taking the lump sum.
rearadmiral wrote:lugnutz wrote:Unless you think you think you can't find a way to earn a greater rate of return then the government you better be taking the lump sum.
What?
lugnutz wrote:rearadmiral wrote:lugnutz wrote:Unless you think you think you can't find a way to earn a greater rate of return then the government you better be taking the lump sum.
What?
I'm going to ignore you know because I am certain you can figure it out on your own.
Giggles wrote:Ummm the world ending 12/21/12 says "hello."
Lump sum please.
cool_hand wrote:Lump sum all the way. Even a palsy 5% return on 200M is 10M. Compound that interest over 20 years and it will get up there.
Though, I'd might consider the annual just to have an excuse to deny all the deadbeats, hanger-ons, second cousins, ex-friends and every other douchebag that comes out of the woodwork looking for free cars and cash.
Users browsing this forum: errordill and 1 guest