said the decision was a &quot

If you cant post anywhere else, you can post here.

Moderators: lugnutz, SHAQ

said the decision was a &quot

Postby jerco522 » Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:32 pm

The newspapers sought data on the budgets after Assemblyman Anthony Portantino (D-La Cañada Flintridge) complained in June that Democratic Assembly leaders slashed his staff budget as political payback for voting against the party's budget proposal.
"This is a huge victory for transparency and accountability," Portantino said in a statement after the Thursday decision. "This issue is no longer about me, but is now about making Sacramento function better by using transparency to improve decision-making and the democratic process."
Attorney Kelli Sager, who represented the newspapers, said the decision was a "strong affirmation of the public's right to know how the state Legislature is spending taxpayer dollars."
A tentative ruling Thursday in favor of the newspapers went into effect after attorneys for the Assembly declined to contest the ruling in oral arguments Friday. The order, however, is not technically final until signed by Judge Timothy Frawley.
Assembly lawyers, who also could appeal the decision, were not immediately available for comment.Frawley wrote that "the court is persuaded that the strong public interest in disclosure outweighs any reason for keeping the records secret."Attorneys for the Legislature had argued that it need not disclose the information under the Legislative Open Records Act.
"In a somewhat ironic twist," Frawley wrote, "the Assembly argues the 'Open Records Act' should be given a narrow interpretation that significantly restricts the public's right to inspect legislative records. Further, the Assembly argues that the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers prohibits this court from enforcing any other interpretation.
jerco522
Not Banned Yet
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:58 am

Return to Penalty Box

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TurnitinBot [Bot] and 1 guest

cron